WILLIS v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 405 U.S. 318 (1972)

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIS v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 405 U.S. 318 (1972)

405 U.S. 318

WILLIS v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA

No. 70-5344.

Argued February 28, 1972
Decided March 20, 1972

227 Ga. 619, 182 S. E. 2d 420, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

E. Freeman Leverett argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

A. Felton Jenkins, Jr., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Woodrow W. Lavender.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 405 U.S. 318, 319




U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIS v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 405 U.S. 318 (1972)

405 U.S. 318

WILLIS v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA

No. 70-5344.

Argued February 28, 1972
Decided March 20, 1972

227 Ga. 619, 182 S. E. 2d 420, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

E. Freeman Leverett argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

A. Felton Jenkins, Jr., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Woodrow W. Lavender.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 405 U.S. 318, 319

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.