BRUNO v. PENNSYLVANIA, 400 U.S. 350 (1971)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

BRUNO v. PENNSYLVANIA, 400 U.S. 350 (1971)

400 U.S. 350

BRUNO v. PENNSYLVANIA
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 205.
Argued December 14, 1970
Decided January 12, 1971

435 Pa. 200, 255 A. 2d 519 and 257 A. 2d 47, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Daniel L. Quinlan, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Milton O. Moss argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 400 U.S. 350, 351




U.S. Supreme Court

BRUNO v. PENNSYLVANIA, 400 U.S. 350 (1971)

400 U.S. 350

BRUNO v. PENNSYLVANIA
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 205.
Argued December 14, 1970
Decided January 12, 1971

435 Pa. 200, 255 A. 2d 519 and 257 A. 2d 47, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Daniel L. Quinlan, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Milton O. Moss argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 400 U.S. 350, 351

Oral Argument - December 14, 1970
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.