NEW YORK v. CONNECTICUT, 4 U.S. 6 (1799)
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK v. CONNECTICUT, 4 U.S. 6 (1799)
4 U.S. 6 (Dall.)
The State of New York
v.
The State of Connecticut et al. *
August Term, 1799
AS the state of Connecticut did not appear, Hoffman moved that she should appear on the first day of next term, or that the plaintiff be then at liberty to proceed ex parte. 3 Dal. 335. But Lewis observed, that the rule required that a subpoena issuing in a suit in equity, should be served sixty days before the return; which had not been done in the present case. The first motion was, thereupon, waived; and an alias subpoena awarded. 3 Dall. 320.
Footnotes
[Footnote *] See same cause at 4 U.S. 1, 4 Dall. 1.[ New York v. Connecticut
Footnote 4 U.S. 6 (1799) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK v. CONNECTICUT, 4 U.S. 6 (1799)
4 U.S. 6 (Dall.)
The State of New York
v.
The State of Connecticut et al. *
August Term, 1799
AS the state of Connecticut did not appear, Hoffman moved that she should appear on the first day of next term, or that the plaintiff be then at liberty to proceed ex parte. 3 Dal. 335. But Lewis observed, that the rule required that a subpoena issuing in a suit in equity, should be served sixty days before the return; which had not been done in the present case. The first motion was, thereupon, waived; and an alias subpoena awarded. 3 Dall. 320.
Footnotes
[Footnote *] See same cause at 4 U.S. 1, 4 Dall. 1.[ New York v. Connecticut
Footnote 4 U.S. 6 (1799) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
