REED v. INGRAHAM, 4 U.S. 169 (1799)
U.S. Supreme Court
REED v. INGRAHAM, 4 U.S. 169 (1799)
4 U.S. 169 (Dall.)
Reed
v.
Ingraham.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December Term, 1799
ON a motion for a new trial, this cause came again before the Court ( 3 Dall. Rep. 505.) but, after argument, the JUDGES cited 4 T. Rep. 2 Bl. 1269.; and declared, that they were confirmed, upon mature deliberation, in the opinion, which had been given in charge to the jury, that the action was well brought in the name of the assignee of the stock contract, promising to receive a transfer from 'J. B. or order.'
Judgment for the plaintiff.
U.S. Supreme Court
REED v. INGRAHAM, 4 U.S. 169 (1799)
4 U.S. 169 (Dall.)
Reed
v.
Ingraham.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December Term, 1799
ON a motion for a new trial, this cause came again before the Court ( 3 Dall. Rep. 505.) but, after argument, the JUDGES cited 4 T. Rep. 2 Bl. 1269.; and declared, that they were confirmed, upon mature deliberation, in the opinion, which had been given in charge to the jury, that the action was well brought in the name of the assignee of the stock contract, promising to receive a transfer from 'J. B. or order.'
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
