REED v. INGRAHAM, 4 U.S. 169 (1799)

U.S. Supreme Court

REED v. INGRAHAM, 4 U.S. 169 (1799)

4 U.S. 169 (Dall.)

Reed
v.
Ingraham.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December Term, 1799

ON a motion for a new trial, this cause came again before the Court ( 3 Dall. Rep. 505.) but, after argument, the JUDGES cited 4 T. Rep. 2 Bl. 1269.; and declared, that they were confirmed, upon mature deliberation, in the opinion, which had been given in charge to the jury, that the action was well brought in the name of the assignee of the stock contract, promising to receive a transfer from 'J. B. or order.'

Judgment for the plaintiff.


U.S. Supreme Court

REED v. INGRAHAM, 4 U.S. 169 (1799)

4 U.S. 169 (Dall.)

Reed
v.
Ingraham.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December Term, 1799

ON a motion for a new trial, this cause came again before the Court ( 3 Dall. Rep. 505.) but, after argument, the JUDGES cited 4 T. Rep. 2 Bl. 1269.; and declared, that they were confirmed, upon mature deliberation, in the opinion, which had been given in charge to the jury, that the action was well brought in the name of the assignee of the stock contract, promising to receive a transfer from 'J. B. or order.'

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.