PEMBERTON'S LESSEE v. HICKS, 4 U.S. 168 (1799)

U.S. Supreme Court

PEMBERTON'S LESSEE v. HICKS, 4 U.S. 168 (1799)

4 U.S. 168 (Dall.)

Pemberton's Lessee
v.
Hicks.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December Term, 1799

THIS cause (which was argued in December term 1798, 3 Dall. Rep. 479.) was kept under advisement till the 23d of December 1799, when SHIPPEN, Chief Justice, and YEATES, Justice, were of opinion with the plaintiff, and SMITH, Justice, was of opinion with the defendant.

Judgment for the plaintiff. [Footnote 1]

Footnotes

Footnote 1 M'KEAN, C. J., presided at the argument of the cause; but, being elected governor of the commonwealth, in October 1799, he took no part in the decision. He informed the Reporter, however, that his opinion was decidedly in favour of the defendant.[ Pemberton's Lessee v. Hicks

Footnote 4 U.S. 168 (1799) ]

 


U.S. Supreme Court

PEMBERTON'S LESSEE v. HICKS, 4 U.S. 168 (1799)

 4 U.S. 168 (Dall.)

Pemberton's Lessee
v.
Hicks.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December Term, 1799

THIS cause (which was argued in December term 1798, 3 Dall. Rep. 479.) was kept under advisement till the 23d of December 1799, when SHIPPEN, Chief Justice, and YEATES, Justice, were of opinion with the plaintiff, and SMITH, Justice, was of opinion with the defendant.

Judgment for the plaintiff. [Footnote 1]

Footnotes

Footnote 1 M'KEAN, C. J., presided at the argument of the cause; but, being elected governor of the commonwealth, in October 1799, he took no part in the decision. He informed the Reporter, however, that his opinion was decidedly in favour of the defendant.[ Pemberton's Lessee v. Hicks

Footnote 4 U.S. 168 (1799) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.