MCEWEN v. GIBBS, 4 U.S. 137 (1794)

U.S. Supreme Court

MCEWEN v. GIBBS, 4 U.S. 137 (1794)

4 U.S. 137 (Dall.)

M'Ewen
v.
Gibbs et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January Term, 1794

CASE, on a parol acceptance of a bill of exchange. The plaintiff, having become a certificated bankrupt, was called as a witness to prove the acceptance. Dollas objected to his competency, on the ground of the witness's liability for costs; and his interest in augmenting the estate surrendered under his commission.

But it appearing, that the assignees carried on the suit, and had entered into security for costs, the COURT (after the plaintiff had released his interest at the bar) directed him to be sworn, upon the authority of Scott v. M'Clenachan.


U.S. Supreme Court

MCEWEN v. GIBBS, 4 U.S. 137 (1794)

4 U.S. 137 (Dall.)

M'Ewen
v.
Gibbs et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January Term, 1794

CASE, on a parol acceptance of a bill of exchange. The plaintiff, having become a certificated bankrupt, was called as a witness to prove the acceptance. Dollas objected to his competency, on the ground of the witness's liability for costs; and his interest in augmenting the estate surrendered under his commission.

But it appearing, that the assignees carried on the suit, and had entered into security for costs, the COURT (after the plaintiff had released his interest at the bar) directed him to be sworn, upon the authority of Scott v. M'Clenachan.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.