PARKER v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 96 (1970)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

PARKER v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 96 (1970)

397 U.S. 96

PARKER v. UNITED STATES
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT No. 992, Misc.
Decided February 27, 1970

Certiorari granted; 411 F.2d 1067, vacated and remanded.

Walter L. Gerash for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney, and Lee B. Anderson for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness filed by the Solicitor General, and upon an examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal as moot.

Page 397 U.S. 96, 97

 


U.S. Supreme Court

PARKER v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 96 (1970)

397 U.S. 96

PARKER v. UNITED STATES
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT No. 992, Misc.
Decided February 27, 1970

Certiorari granted; 411 F.2d 1067, vacated and remanded.

Walter L. Gerash for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney, and Lee B. Anderson for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness filed by the Solicitor General, and upon an examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal as moot.

Page 397 U.S. 96, 97

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.