TEX TAN WELHAUSEN CO. v. N.L.R.B., 397 U.S. 819 (1970)

U.S. Supreme Court

TEX TAN WELHAUSEN CO. v. N.L.R.B. , 397 U.S. 819 (1970)

397 U.S. 819

TEX TAN WELHAUSEN CO. et al.
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
No. 1288.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 1970

Theo. F. Weiss, for petitioners.

Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher, for respondent.

L. N. D. Wells, Jr., for Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of H. K. Porter Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 397 U.S. 99.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS dissents to the remand.[ Tex Tan Welhausen Co. v. N.L.R.B. 397 U.S. 819 (1970) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

TEX TAN WELHAUSEN CO. v. N.L.R.B. , 397 U.S. 819 (1970)

 397 U.S. 819

TEX TAN WELHAUSEN CO. et al.
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
No. 1288.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 1970

Theo. F. Weiss, for petitioners.

Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher, for respondent.

L. N. D. Wells, Jr., for Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of H. K. Porter Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 397 U.S. 99.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS dissents to the remand.[ Tex Tan Welhausen Co. v. N.L.R.B. 397 U.S. 819 (1970) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.