BELL LINES INC. v. U.S., 397 U.S. 818 (1970)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

BELL LINES INC. v. U.S. , 397 U.S. 818 (1970)

397 U.S. 818

BELL LINES, INC., et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 893.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 1970

Harold Hernly, William T. Brotherton, Harry J. Jordan, Robert S. Burk, Robert R. Redmon, James E. Wilson, Edward G. Villalon, and Charles H. Ephraim, for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Nahum Litt, for appellees United States and others.

A. Alvis Layne, for appellee Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service, 397 U.S. 532.[ Bell Lines Inc. v. U.S. 397 U.S. 818 (1970) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

BELL LINES INC. v. U.S. , 397 U.S. 818 (1970)

 397 U.S. 818

BELL LINES, INC., et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 893.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 1970

Harold Hernly, William T. Brotherton, Harry J. Jordan, Robert S. Burk, Robert R. Redmon, James E. Wilson, Edward G. Villalon, and Charles H. Ephraim, for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Nahum Litt, for appellees United States and others.

A. Alvis Layne, for appellee Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service, 397 U.S. 532.[ Bell Lines Inc. v. U.S. 397 U.S. 818 (1970) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.