BELL LINES INC. v. U.S., 397 U.S. 818 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
BELL LINES INC. v. U.S. , 397 U.S. 818 (1970)
397 U.S. 818
BELL LINES, INC., et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 893.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 4, 1970
Harold Hernly, William T. Brotherton, Harry J. Jordan, Robert S. Burk, Robert R. Redmon, James E. Wilson, Edward G. Villalon, and Charles H. Ephraim, for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Nahum Litt, for appellees United States and others.
A. Alvis Layne, for appellee Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service, 397 U.S. 532.[ Bell Lines Inc. v. U.S. 397 U.S. 818 (1970) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
BELL LINES INC. v. U.S. , 397 U.S. 818 (1970)
BELL LINES, INC., et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 893.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 4, 1970
Harold Hernly, William T. Brotherton, Harry J. Jordan, Robert S. Burk, Robert R. Redmon, James E. Wilson, Edward G. Villalon, and Charles H. Ephraim, for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Nahum Litt, for appellees United States and others.
A. Alvis Layne, for appellee Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service, 397 U.S. 532.[ Bell Lines Inc. v. U.S. 397 U.S. 818 (1970) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.