MONTGOMERY v. KAISER, 397 U.S. 595 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
MONTGOMERY v. KAISER , 397 U.S. 595 (1970)
397 U.S. 595
John MONTGOMERY, Director, California Department of Social Welfare, et al.
v.
Ernestine KAISER et al.
No. 828.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 20, 1970
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Thomas L. Fike, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration in light of Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice MARSHALL are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.[ Montgomery v. Kaiser 397 U.S. 595 (1970) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
MONTGOMERY v. KAISER , 397 U.S. 595 (1970)
John MONTGOMERY, Director, California Department of Social Welfare, et al.
v.
Ernestine KAISER et al.
No. 828.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 20, 1970
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Thomas L. Fike, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration in light of Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice MARSHALL are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.[ Montgomery v. Kaiser 397 U.S. 595 (1970) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.