MONTGOMERY v. KAISER, 397 U.S. 595 (1970)

U.S. Supreme Court

MONTGOMERY v. KAISER , 397 U.S. 595 (1970)

397 U.S. 595

John MONTGOMERY, Director, California Department of Social Welfare, et al.
v.
Ernestine KAISER et al.
No. 828.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 20, 1970

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellants.

Thomas L. Fike, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration in light of Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice MARSHALL are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.[ Montgomery v. Kaiser 397 U.S. 595 (1970) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

MONTGOMERY v. KAISER , 397 U.S. 595 (1970)

397 U.S. 595

John MONTGOMERY, Director, California Department of Social Welfare, et al.
v.
Ernestine KAISER et al.
No. 828.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 20, 1970

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellants.

Thomas L. Fike, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration in light of Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice MARSHALL are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.[ Montgomery v. Kaiser 397 U.S. 595 (1970) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.