MONTGOMERY v. KAISER, 397 U.S. 595 (1970)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
MONTGOMERY v. KAISER , 397 U.S. 595 (1970)397 U.S. 595
John MONTGOMERY, Director,
California Department of Social Welfare, et al.
v.
Ernestine KAISER et al.
No. 828.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 20, 1970
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Thomas L. Fike, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration in light of Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice
MARSHALL are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.[
Montgomery v. Kaiser 397 U.S. 595 (1970) ]
Opinions
v.
Ernestine KAISER et al.
No. 828. Supreme Court of the United States April 20, 1970 Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellants. Thomas L. Fike, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration in light of Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice MARSHALL are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.[ Montgomery v. Kaiser 397 U.S. 595 (1970) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
MONTGOMERY v. KAISER , 397 U.S. 595 (1970) 397 U.S. 595 John MONTGOMERY, Director, California Department of Social Welfare, et al.v.
Ernestine KAISER et al.
No. 828. Supreme Court of the United States April 20, 1970 Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellants. Thomas L. Fike, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration in light of Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice MARSHALL are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.[ Montgomery v. Kaiser 397 U.S. 595 (1970) ]
Search This Case
