HACKNEY v. MACHADO, 397 U.S. 593 (1970)

U.S. Supreme Court

HACKNEY v. MACHADO , 397 U.S. 593 (1970)

397 U.S. 593

Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
v.
Margarita MACHADO et al.
No. 553.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 20, 1970

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Hawthorne Phillips, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. C. Davis and John H. Banks, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

C. Stanley Banks, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice BLACK, and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent.[ Hackney v. Machado 397 U.S. 593 (1970) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

HACKNEY v. MACHADO , 397 U.S. 593 (1970)

397 U.S. 593

Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
v.
Margarita MACHADO et al.
No. 553.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 20, 1970

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Hawthorne Phillips, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. C. Davis and John H. Banks, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

C. Stanley Banks, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice BLACK, and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent.[ Hackney v. Machado 397 U.S. 593 (1970) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.