GABLE v. JENKINS, 397 U.S. 592 (1970)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

GABLE v. JENKINS , 397 U.S. 592 (1970)

397 U.S. 592

George GABLE, dba Book Sales Co.
v.
Herbert L. JENKINS, Chief of Police.
No. 1049.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 20, 1970

Wesley R. Asinof, for appellant.

Henry L. Bowden, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.[ Gable v. Jenkins 397 U.S. 592 (1970) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

GABLE v. JENKINS , 397 U.S. 592 (1970)

 397 U.S. 592

George GABLE, dba Book Sales Co.
v.
Herbert L. JENKINS, Chief of Police.
No. 1049.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 20, 1970

Wesley R. Asinof, for appellant.

Henry L. Bowden, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.[ Gable v. Jenkins 397 U.S. 592 (1970) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.