JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA, 397 U.S. 589 (1970)

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA, 397 U.S. 589 (1970)

JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA, 397 U.S. 589 (1970) 397 U.S. 589

JACKSON ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA No. 471, Misc.
Decided April 20, 1970

Vacated and remanded.

Howard W. Dixon for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, T. T. Turnbull and Michael Schwartz, Assistant Attorneys General, and S. Strome Maxwell for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, ante, p. 254; Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23; and to determine whether the case is moot.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent.

Page 397 U.S. 589, 590




U.S. Supreme Court Reports

JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA, 397 U.S. 589 (1970)

JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA, 397 U.S. 589 (1970) 397 U.S. 589

JACKSON ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA No. 471, Misc.
Decided April 20, 1970

Vacated and remanded.

Howard W. Dixon for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, T. T. Turnbull and Michael Schwartz, Assistant Attorneys General, and S. Strome Maxwell for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, ante, p. 254; Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23; and to determine whether the case is moot.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent.

Page 397 U.S. 589, 590

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.