WYMAN v. BOWENS, 397 U.S. 49 (1970)

U.S. Supreme Court

WYMAN v. BOWENS, 397 U.S. 49 (1970)

397 U.S. 49

WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK v. BOWENS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK No. 866.
Decided February 24, 1970*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 874, Lascaris, Commissioner of Onondaga County Department of Social Services v. Bowens et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.

304 F. Supp. 717, affirmed.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant in No. 866. Leonard C. Koldin for appellant in No. 874.

Sydney M. Spector and Richard A. Ellison for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed. Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.

Page 397 U.S. 49, 50




U.S. Supreme Court

WYMAN v. BOWENS, 397 U.S. 49 (1970)

397 U.S. 49

WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK v. BOWENS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK No. 866.
Decided February 24, 1970*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 874, Lascaris, Commissioner of Onondaga County Department of Social Services v. Bowens et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.

304 F. Supp. 717, affirmed.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant in No. 866. Leonard C. Koldin for appellant in No. 874.

Sydney M. Spector and Richard A. Ellison for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed. Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.

Page 397 U.S. 49, 50

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.