TROUTMAN v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 48 (1970)

U.S. Supreme Court

TROUTMAN v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 48 (1970)

397 U.S. 48

TROUTMAN v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 623.
Decided February 24, 1970*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 411, Misc., Battiste v. United States, on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Certiorari granted; No. 623, 412 F.2d 810, and No. 411, Misc., 409 F.2d 910, vacated and remanded.

George C. Pontikes for petitioner in No. 623. Howard Moore, Jr., for petitioner in No. 411, Misc.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Philip R. Monahan for the United States in No. 623. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome Feit, and Edward Fenig for the United States in No. 411, Misc.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 411, Misc., is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the cases remanded to the respective United States Courts of Appeals for further consideration in light of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295.

Page 397 U.S. 48, 49




U.S. Supreme Court

TROUTMAN v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 48 (1970)

397 U.S. 48

TROUTMAN v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 623.
Decided February 24, 1970*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 411, Misc., Battiste v. United States, on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Certiorari granted; No. 623, 412 F.2d 810, and No. 411, Misc., 409 F.2d 910, vacated and remanded.

George C. Pontikes for petitioner in No. 623. Howard Moore, Jr., for petitioner in No. 411, Misc.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Philip R. Monahan for the United States in No. 623. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome Feit, and Edward Fenig for the United States in No. 411, Misc.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 411, Misc., is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the cases remanded to the respective United States Courts of Appeals for further consideration in light of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295.

Page 397 U.S. 48, 49

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.