BURRUSS v. WILKERSON, 397 U.S. 44 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
BURRUSS v. WILKERSON, 397 U.S. 44 (1970)
397 U.S. 44 BURRUSS ET AL. v. WILKERSON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 864.
Decided February 24, 1970
Affirmed.
Carl Rachlin, Melvin L. Wulf, and Eleanor Holmes Norton for appellants.
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, Richard N. Harris, Assistant Attorney General, John S. Davenport III, and Henry T. Wickham for appellees.
Briefs of amici curiae in support of appellants were filed by Ramsey Clark, David Rubin, and John W. Douglas for the National Education Association et al., and by Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, J. Albert Woll, Thomas E. Harris, Stephen I. Schlossberg, and David A. Binder for the American Federation of Labor - Congress of Industrial Organizations et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
U.S. Supreme Court
BURRUSS v. WILKERSON, 397 U.S. 44 (1970)
397 U.S. 44 BURRUSS ET AL. v. WILKERSON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 864.
Decided February 24, 1970
Affirmed.
Carl Rachlin, Melvin L. Wulf, and Eleanor Holmes Norton for appellants.
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, Richard N. Harris, Assistant Attorney General, John S. Davenport III, and Henry T. Wickham for appellees.
Briefs of amici curiae in support of appellants were filed by Ramsey Clark, David Rubin, and John W. Douglas for the National Education Association et al., and by Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, J. Albert Woll, Thomas E. Harris, Stephen I. Schlossberg, and David A. Binder for the American Federation of Labor - Congress of Industrial Organizations et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
