CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORP. v. CALVERT, 397 U.S. 321 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORP. v. CALVERT , 397 U.S. 321 (1970)
397 U.S. 321
CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORPORATION et al.
v.
Robert S. CALVERT, Comptroller, et al.
No. 1130.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 23, 1970
J. Sam Winters, Henry D. Akin, Jr., and William D. Powell, for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, pro se.
Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., John R. Grace and William Edward Allen, Asst. Attys. Gen., and William B. Hilgers, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.[ Capital Southwest Corp. v. Calvert 397 U.S. 321 (1970) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORP. v. CALVERT , 397 U.S. 321 (1970)
CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORPORATION et al.
v.
Robert S. CALVERT, Comptroller, et al.
No. 1130.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 23, 1970
J. Sam Winters, Henry D. Akin, Jr., and William D. Powell, for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, pro se.
Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., John R. Grace and William Edward Allen, Asst. Attys. Gen., and William B. Hilgers, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.[ Capital Southwest Corp. v. Calvert 397 U.S. 321 (1970) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.