MARKS v. CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 397 U.S. 316 (1970)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

MARKS v. CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 397 U.S. 316 (1970)

397 U.S. 316

MARKS v. CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 1107.
Decided March 23, 1970

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Burton Marks, appellant, pro se.

Roger Arnebergh for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 397 U.S. 316, 317

 


U.S. Supreme Court

MARKS v. CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 397 U.S. 316 (1970)

397 U.S. 316

MARKS v. CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 1107.
Decided March 23, 1970

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Burton Marks, appellant, pro se.

Roger Arnebergh for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 397 U.S. 316, 317

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.