LAIKIND v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, 397 U.S. 148 (1970)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

LAIKIND v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, 397 U.S. 148 (1970)

397 U.S. 148

LAIKIND v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 68.
Decided March 2, 1970

22 N.Y.2d 346, 239 N.E.2d 550, appeal dismissed.

Victor Konow for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Warren M. Goidel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final judgment.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.

Page 397 U.S. 148, 149

 


U.S. Supreme Court

LAIKIND v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, 397 U.S. 148 (1970)

397 U.S. 148

LAIKIND v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 68.
Decided March 2, 1970

22 N.Y.2d 346, 239 N.E.2d 550, appeal dismissed.

Victor Konow for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Warren M. Goidel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final judgment.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.

Page 397 U.S. 148, 149

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.