PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY OF SEATTLE, 396 U.S. 803 (1969)
396 U.S. 803 PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON CITY OF SEATTLE Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1969. October Term, 1969. October 13, 1969U.S. Supreme Court
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY OF SEATTLE , 396 U.S. 803 (1969)
v.
CITY OF SEATTLE.
No. 2.
v.
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
No. 3.
Clarence C. Dill, William G. Ennis, and Bennett Boskey, for Public Utility Dist. No. 1 of Pend Oreille County.
A. L. Newbould and Richard S. White, for City of Seattle.
Solicitor General Griswold, for the United States, amicus curiae.
The petitions for writs of certiorari dismissed under Rule 60.[ Public Utility Dist. v. City of Seattle 396 U.S. 803 (1969) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY OF SEATTLE , 396 U.S. 803 (1969)
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
v.
CITY OF SEATTLE.
No. 2.
CITY OF SEATTLE
v.
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
No. 3.
Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1969.
October Term, 1969.
October 13, 1969
Clarence C. Dill, William G. Ennis, and Bennett Boskey, for Public Utility Dist. No. 1 of Pend Oreille County.
A. L. Newbould and Richard S. White, for City of Seattle.
Solicitor General Griswold, for the United States, amicus curiae.
The petitions for writs of certiorari dismissed under Rule 60.[ Public Utility Dist. v. City of Seattle 396 U.S. 803 (1969) ]
