INTERCO INC. v. RHODEN, 396 U.S. 7 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
INTERCO INC. v. RHODEN, 396 U.S. 7 (1969) 396 U.S. 7 INTERCO INC. v. RHODEN, CHAIRMAN, MISSISSIPPI TAX COMMISSION
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
No. 306.
Decided October 13, 1969
220 So. 2d 290, appeal dismissed.
James Leon Young for appellant.
John E. Stone for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
KELLAR v. NEAL, 396 U.S. 7 (1969) 396 U.S. 7 KELLAR v. NEAL ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
No. 308.
Decided October 13, 1969
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
INTERCO INC. v. RHODEN, 396 U.S. 7 (1969) 396 U.S. 7 INTERCO INC. v. RHODEN, CHAIRMAN, MISSISSIPPI TAX COMMISSION
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
No. 306.
Decided October 13, 1969
220 So. 2d 290, appeal dismissed.
James Leon Young for appellant.
John E. Stone for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
KELLAR v. NEAL, 396 U.S. 7 (1969) 396 U.S. 7 KELLAR v. NEAL ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
No. 308.
Decided October 13, 1969
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 396 U.S. 7, 8
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
