STEIN v. LUKEN, 396 U.S. 555 (1970)

U.S. Supreme Court

STEIN v. LUKEN, 396 U.S. 555 (1970) 396 U.S. 555

STEIN v. LUKEN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
No. 854.
Decided February 2, 1970

Appeal dismissed.

Yale Stein, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by Rule 13.

PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/555/case.html">396 U.S. 555</a> (1970) 396 U.S. 555 (1970) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 555 (1970) 396 U.S. 555

PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK No. 919.
Decided February 2, 1970

300 F. Supp. 185, affirmed.

Harold I. Meyerson for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Deputy Solicitor General Springer, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Leonard S. Goodman for appellees the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 396 U.S. 555, 556

 


U.S. Supreme Court

STEIN v. LUKEN, 396 U.S. 555 (1970) 396 U.S. 555

STEIN v. LUKEN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
No. 854.
Decided February 2, 1970

Appeal dismissed.

Yale Stein, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by Rule 13.

PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/555/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/396/555/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/396/555/">396 U.S. 555</a></a></a> (1970) 396 U.S. 555 (1970) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 555 (1970) 396 U.S. 555

PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK No. 919.
Decided February 2, 1970

300 F. Supp. 185, affirmed.

Harold I. Meyerson for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Deputy Solicitor General Springer, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Leonard S. Goodman for appellees the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 396 U.S. 555, 556

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.