JOHNSON v. WASSERMAN, 396 U.S. 554 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
JOHNSON v. WASSERMAN, 396 U.S. 554 (1970) 396 U.S. 554 JOHNSON ET AL. v. WASSERMAN, JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
No. 832.
Decided February 2, 1970
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Alvin A. Fein for appellants.
John T. Corrigan and John L. Dowling for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 396 U.S. 554 (1970) 396 U.S. 554 KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 836.
Decided February 2, 1970
273 Cal. App. 2d 430, 78 Cal. Rptr. 260, appeal dismissed.
Charles R. B. Kirk, Norman Dorsen, Clark Byse, and William W. Van Alstyne for appellant.
Thomas J. Cunningham and David W. Louisell for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
JOHNSON v. WASSERMAN, 396 U.S. 554 (1970) 396 U.S. 554 JOHNSON ET AL. v. WASSERMAN, JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
No. 832.
Decided February 2, 1970
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Alvin A. Fein for appellants.
John T. Corrigan and John L. Dowling for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 396 U.S. 554 (1970) 396 U.S. 554 KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 836.
Decided February 2, 1970
273 Cal. App. 2d 430, 78 Cal. Rptr. 260, appeal dismissed.
Charles R. B. Kirk, Norman Dorsen, Clark Byse, and William W. Van Alstyne for appellant.
Thomas J. Cunningham and David W. Louisell for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 396 U.S. 554, 555
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
