JORDAN v. ARIZONA EX REL. NELSON, 396 U.S. 5 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

JORDAN v. ARIZONA EX REL. NELSON, 396 U.S. 5 (1969) 396 U.S. 5

JORDAN v. ARIZONA EX REL. NELSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA
No. 204.
Decided October 13, 1969

104 Ariz. 193, 450 P.2d 383, appeal dismissed.

Stewart L. Udall for appellant.

Gary K. Nelson, Attorney General of Arizona, appellee, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SHAPIRO, v. SOLMAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/5/case.html">396 U.S. 5</a> (1969) 396 U.S. 5 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SHAPIRO, v. SOLMAN, 396 U.S. 5 (1969) 396 U.S. 5

SHAPIRO, COMMISSIONER OF WELFARE OF CONNECTICUT v. SOLMAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
CONNECTICUT No. 215.
Decided October 13, 1969

300 F. Supp. 409, affirmed.

Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Francis J. MacGregor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Francis X. Dineen for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. See King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309.

Page 396 U.S. 5, 6




U.S. Supreme Court

JORDAN v. ARIZONA EX REL. NELSON, 396 U.S. 5 (1969) 396 U.S. 5

JORDAN v. ARIZONA EX REL. NELSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA
No. 204.
Decided October 13, 1969

104 Ariz. 193, 450 P.2d 383, appeal dismissed.

Stewart L. Udall for appellant.

Gary K. Nelson, Attorney General of Arizona, appellee, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SHAPIRO, v. SOLMAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/5/case.html">396 U.S. 5</a> (1969) 396 U.S. 5 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SHAPIRO, v. SOLMAN, 396 U.S. 5 (1969) 396 U.S. 5

SHAPIRO, COMMISSIONER OF WELFARE OF CONNECTICUT v. SOLMAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
CONNECTICUT No. 215.
Decided October 13, 1969

300 F. Supp. 409, affirmed.

Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Francis J. MacGregor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Francis X. Dineen for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. See King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309.

Page 396 U.S. 5, 6

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.