IMPERIAL REFINERIES OF MINNESOTA v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, 396 U.S. 4 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
IMPERIAL REFINERIES OF MINNESOTA v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, 396 U.S. 4 (1969)
396 U.S. 4 IMPERIAL REFINERIES OF MINNESOTA, INC. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA
No. 171.
Decided October 13, 1969
282 Minn. 481, 165 N. W. 2d 699, appeal dismissed.
Marshall S. Snyder for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
WHEELER v. VERMONT, 396 U.S. 4 (1969)
396 U.S. 4 WHEELER v. VERMONT
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT
No. 199.
Decided October 13, 1969
___ Vt. ___, ___, 249 A. 2d 887, 253 A. 2d 136, appeal dismissed.
James C. Cleveland for appellant.
Jerome R. Hellerstein for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
IMPERIAL REFINERIES OF MINNESOTA v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, 396 U.S. 4 (1969)
396 U.S. 4 IMPERIAL REFINERIES OF MINNESOTA, INC. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA
No. 171.
Decided October 13, 1969
282 Minn. 481, 165 N. W. 2d 699, appeal dismissed.
Marshall S. Snyder for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
WHEELER v. VERMONT, 396 U.S. 4 (1969)
396 U.S. 4 WHEELER v. VERMONT
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT
No. 199.
Decided October 13, 1969
___ Vt. ___, ___, 249 A. 2d 887, 253 A. 2d 136, appeal dismissed.
James C. Cleveland for appellant.
Jerome R. Hellerstein for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
