LAWRENCE v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 396 U.S. 39 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
LAWRENCE v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 396 U.S. 39 (1969)
396 U.S. 39 LAWRENCE ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
No. 509.
Decided November 17, 1969
42 Ill. 2d 461, 248 N.E.2d 71, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
John M. Bowlus for appellants.
Raymond F. Simon, Marvin E. Aspen, and John J. George for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
LAWRENCE v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 396 U.S. 39 (1969)
396 U.S. 39 LAWRENCE ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
No. 509.
Decided November 17, 1969
42 Ill. 2d 461, 248 N.E.2d 71, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
John M. Bowlus for appellants.
Raymond F. Simon, Marvin E. Aspen, and John J. George for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Page 396 U.S. 39, 40
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
