DOYLE v. O'BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, 396 U.S. 277 (1970)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

DOYLE v. O'BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, 396 U.S. 277 (1970) 396 U.S. 277

DOYLE ET AL. v. O'BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS No. 1123, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1970

 304 F. Supp. 704, affirmed.

Edward J. Duggan for appellants.

Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, John Wall, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence P. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SWAIN v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/277/case.html">396 U.S. 277</a> (1970) 396 U.S. 277 (1970) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SWAIN v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, 396 U.S. 277 (1970) 396 U.S. 277

SWAIN ET AL. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT No. 714.
Decided January 12, 1970

433 S.W.2d 727, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

William Burrow for appellants.

Alfred L. Ruebel for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 277, 278

 


U.S. Supreme Court

DOYLE v. O'BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, 396 U.S. 277 (1970) 396 U.S. 277

DOYLE ET AL. v. O'BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS No. 1123, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1970

 304 F. Supp. 704, affirmed.

Edward J. Duggan for appellants.

Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, John Wall, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence P. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SWAIN v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/277/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/396/277/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/396/277/">396 U.S. 277</a></a></a> (1970) 396 U.S. 277 (1970) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SWAIN v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, 396 U.S. 277 (1970) 396 U.S. 277

SWAIN ET AL. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT No. 714.
Decided January 12, 1970

433 S.W.2d 727, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

William Burrow for appellants.

Alfred L. Ruebel for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 277, 278

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.