SANCHEZ v. NEW MEXICO, 396 U.S. 276 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
SANCHEZ v. NEW MEXICO, 396 U.S. 276 (1970) 396 U.S. 276 SANCHEZ v. NEW MEXICO
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO
No. 974, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1970
80 N. M. 438, 457 P.2d 370, appeal dismissed.
Pat Sheehan for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
ARIEL v. MASSACHUSETTS, 396 U.S. 276 (1970) 396 U.S. 276 ARIEL v. MASSACHUSETTS
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS
No. 897, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1970
___ Mass. ___, 248 N. E. 2d 496, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Edward J. Duggan for appellant.
Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, John Wall, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence P. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
U.S. Supreme Court
SANCHEZ v. NEW MEXICO, 396 U.S. 276 (1970) 396 U.S. 276 SANCHEZ v. NEW MEXICO
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO
No. 974, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1970
80 N. M. 438, 457 P.2d 370, appeal dismissed.
Pat Sheehan for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
ARIEL v. MASSACHUSETTS, 396 U.S. 276 (1970) 396 U.S. 276 ARIEL v. MASSACHUSETTS
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS
No. 897, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1970
___ Mass. ___, 248 N. E. 2d 496, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Edward J. Duggan for appellant.
Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, John Wall, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence P. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
