IN RE REED, 396 U.S. 274 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
IN RE REED, 396 U.S. 274 (1970) 396 U.S. 274 IN RE REED
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE
No. 706.
Decided January 12, 1970
___ Del. ___, 257 A.2d 382, appeal dismissed.
Warren B. Burt for appellant.
David P. Buckson, Attorney General, and Ruth M. Ferrell, State Solicitor, for the State of Delaware.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, 396 U.S. 274 (1970) 396 U.S. 274 LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 715.
Decided January 12, 1970
271 Cal. App. 2d 774, 76 Cal. Rptr. 869, appeal dismissed.
Randal F. Dickey, Jr., and Robert L. McCarty for appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Harold B. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, and William J. Power, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
IN RE REED, 396 U.S. 274 (1970) 396 U.S. 274 IN RE REED
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE
No. 706.
Decided January 12, 1970
___ Del. ___, 257 A.2d 382, appeal dismissed.
Warren B. Burt for appellant.
David P. Buckson, Attorney General, and Ruth M. Ferrell, State Solicitor, for the State of Delaware.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, 396 U.S. 274 (1970) 396 U.S. 274 LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 715.
Decided January 12, 1970
271 Cal. App. 2d 774, 76 Cal. Rptr. 869, appeal dismissed.
Randal F. Dickey, Jr., and Robert L. McCarty for appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Harold B. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, and William J. Power, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 396 U.S. 274, 275
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
