CARLTON v. CONNER, 396 U.S. 272 (1969)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CARLTON v. CONNER, 396 U.S. 272 (1969) 396 U.S. 272CARLTON ET AL. v. CONNER, COMMISSIONER
OF AGRICULTURE OF FLORIDA
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 625.
Decided December 15, 1969
223 So. 2d 324, appeal dismissed.
John R. Beranek and Charles H. Damsel, Jr., for appellants.
Robert A. Chastain for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 625.
Decided December 15, 1969
223 So. 2d 324, appeal dismissed. John R. Beranek and Charles H. Damsel, Jr., for appellants. Robert A. Chastain for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 396 U.S. 272, 273
U.S. Supreme Court
CARLTON v. CONNER, 396 U.S. 272 (1969) 396 U.S. 272 CARLTON ET AL. v. CONNER, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF FLORIDAAPPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 625.
Decided December 15, 1969
223 So. 2d 324, appeal dismissed. John R. Beranek and Charles H. Damsel, Jr., for appellants. Robert A. Chastain for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 396 U.S. 272, 273
Search This Case
