KING v. GREENBLATT, 396 U.S. 26 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
KING v. GREENBLATT, 396 U.S. 26 (1969)
396 U.S. 26 KING v. GREENBLATT ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS No. 615, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969
Affirmed.
Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and John Wall and Edward W. Hanley III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, 396 U.S. 26 (1969)
396 U.S. 26 ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
No. 686, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969
41 Wis. 2d 497, 164 N. W. 2d 512, appeal dismissed.
Anthony G. Amsterdam, Michael Meltsner, and Melvyn Zarr for appellant.
Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz, Sverre O. Tinglum, and William F. Eich, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
KING v. GREENBLATT, 396 U.S. 26 (1969)
396 U.S. 26 KING v. GREENBLATT ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS No. 615, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969
Affirmed.
Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and John Wall and Edward W. Hanley III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, 396 U.S. 26 (1969)
396 U.S. 26 ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
No. 686, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969
41 Wis. 2d 497, 164 N. W. 2d 512, appeal dismissed.
Anthony G. Amsterdam, Michael Meltsner, and Melvyn Zarr for appellant.
Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz, Sverre O. Tinglum, and William F. Eich, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
