KING v. GREENBLATT
396 U.S. 26 (1969)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

KING v. GREENBLATT, 396 U.S. 26 (1969)

396 U.S. 26

KING v. GREENBLATT ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS No. 615, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969

Affirmed.

Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and John Wall and Edward W. Hanley III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/26/case.html">396 U.S. 26</a> (1969) 396 U.S. 26 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, 396 U.S. 26 (1969)

396 U.S. 26

ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
No. 686, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969

41 Wis. 2d 497, 164 N. W. 2d 512, appeal dismissed.

Anthony G. Amsterdam, Michael Meltsner, and Melvyn Zarr for appellant.

Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz, Sverre O. Tinglum, and William F. Eich, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 396 U.S. 26, 27




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.