SPALDING LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANING v. DEPT. OF REV. OF KY., 396 U.S. 2 (1969)
SPALDING LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANING CO. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY U.S. Supreme Court
SPALDING LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANING v. DEPT. OF REV. OF KY., 396 U.S. 2 (1969) 396 U.S. 2
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY
No. 123.
Decided October 13, 1969
436 S.W.2d 522, appeal dismissed.
T. Kennedy Helm, Jr., for appellant.
William S. Riley, Assistant Attorney General of Kentucky, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
DUFFY STORAGE & MOVING CO. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 396 U.S. 2 (1969) 396 U.S. 2 DUFFY STORAGE & MOVING CO. ET AL. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 132.
Decided October 13, 1969
___ Colo. ___, 450 P.2d 339, appeal dismissed.
George Louis Creamer for appellants.
Max P. Zall for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
SPALDING LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANING v. DEPT. OF REV. OF KY., 396 U.S. 2 (1969) 396 U.S. 2 SPALDING LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANING CO. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY
No. 123.
Decided October 13, 1969
436 S.W.2d 522, appeal dismissed.
T. Kennedy Helm, Jr., for appellant.
William S. Riley, Assistant Attorney General of Kentucky, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
DUFFY STORAGE & MOVING CO. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 396 U.S. 2 (1969) 396 U.S. 2 DUFFY STORAGE & MOVING CO. ET AL. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 132.
Decided October 13, 1969
___ Colo. ___, 450 P.2d 339, appeal dismissed.
George Louis Creamer for appellants.
Max P. Zall for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 396 U.S. 2, 3
