WASHUM v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 18 (1969)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

WASHUM v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 18 (1969)

396 U.S. 18

WASHUM, DBA LOS ANGELES-YUMA FREIGHT LINES, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
No. 374.
Decided October 27, 1969

Affirmed.

James W. Wrape and Robert E. Joyner for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Robert Y. Schureman for Consolidated Copperstate Lines et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

COX, v. TENNESSEE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/18/case.html">396 U.S. 18</a> (1969) 396 U.S. 18 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COX, v. TENNESSEE, 396 U.S. 18 (1969)

396 U.S. 18

COX, GUARDIAN v. TENNESSEE, BY AND THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
No. 430.
Decided October 27, 1969

___ Tenn. ___, 439 S. W. 2d 267, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas F. Turley, Jr., for appellant.

Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General of Tennessee, and C. Hayes Cooney, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 18, 19




U.S. Supreme Court

WASHUM v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 18 (1969)

396 U.S. 18

WASHUM, DBA LOS ANGELES-YUMA FREIGHT LINES, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
No. 374.
Decided October 27, 1969

Affirmed.

James W. Wrape and Robert E. Joyner for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Robert Y. Schureman for Consolidated Copperstate Lines et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

COX, v. TENNESSEE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/18/case.html">396 U.S. 18</a> (1969) 396 U.S. 18 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COX, v. TENNESSEE, 396 U.S. 18 (1969)

396 U.S. 18

COX, GUARDIAN v. TENNESSEE, BY AND THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
No. 430.
Decided October 27, 1969

___ Tenn. ___, 439 S. W. 2d 267, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas F. Turley, Jr., for appellant.

Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General of Tennessee, and C. Hayes Cooney, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 18, 19

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.