SHANKER v. RANKIN, 396 U.S. 120 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
SHANKER v. RANKIN, 396 U.S. 120 (1969)
396 U.S. 120 SHANKER ET AL. v. RANKIN, CORPORATION COUNSEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 552.
Decided December 8, 1969
25 N.Y.2d 780, 250 N.E.2d 584, appeal dismissed.
Ralph P. Katz for appellants.
J. Lee Rankin, pro se, Frederic S. Nathan, and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
SHANKER v. RANKIN, 396 U.S. 120 (1969)
396 U.S. 120 SHANKER ET AL. v. RANKIN, CORPORATION COUNSEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 552.
Decided December 8, 1969
25 N.Y.2d 780, 250 N.E.2d 584, appeal dismissed.
Ralph P. Katz for appellants.
J. Lee Rankin, pro se, Frederic S. Nathan, and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Page 396 U.S. 120, 121
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
