NEW ORLEANS CHAPTER v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 115 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW ORLEANS CHAPTER v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 115 (1969)
396 U.S. 115 NEW ORLEANS CHAPTER, ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC.
v. UNITED STATES
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA
No. 599.Decided December 8, 1969
Affirmed.
R. Emmett Kerrigan, Ralph L. Kaskell, Jr., and George W. Wise for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, and Irwin A. Seibel for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
HUESDASH v. HASKINS, 396 U.S. 115 (1969)
396 U.S. 115 HUESDASH v. HASKINS, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
No. 816, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1969
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW ORLEANS CHAPTER v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 115 (1969)
396 U.S. 115 NEW ORLEANS CHAPTER, ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC.
v. UNITED STATES
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA
No. 599.Decided December 8, 1969
Affirmed.
R. Emmett Kerrigan, Ralph L. Kaskell, Jr., and George W. Wise for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, and Irwin A. Seibel for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
HUESDASH v. HASKINS, 396 U.S. 115 (1969)
396 U.S. 115 HUESDASH v. HASKINS, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
No. 816, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1969
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
