BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD., 396 U.S. 114 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD., 396 U.S. 114 (1969) 396 U.S. 114

BALTHAZAR ET UX. v. MARI LTD. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS No. 593.
Decided December 8, 1969

 301 F. Supp. 103, affirmed.

Marshall Patner for appellants.

Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MATHIS v. NELSON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/114/">396 U.S. 114</a> (1969) 396 U.S. 114 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MATHIS v. NELSON, 396 U.S. 114 (1969) 396 U.S. 114

MATHIS v. NELSON, WARDEN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 620, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1969

 70 Cal. 2d 467, 450 P.2d 290, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 114, 115

 


U.S. Supreme Court

BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD., 396 U.S. 114 (1969) 396 U.S. 114

BALTHAZAR ET UX. v. MARI LTD. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS No. 593.
Decided December 8, 1969

 301 F. Supp. 103, affirmed.

Marshall Patner for appellants.

Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MATHIS v. NELSON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/114/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/396/114/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/396/114/">396 U.S. 114</a></a></a> (1969) 396 U.S. 114 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MATHIS v. NELSON, 396 U.S. 114 (1969) 396 U.S. 114

MATHIS v. NELSON, WARDEN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 620, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1969

 70 Cal. 2d 467, 450 P.2d 290, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 114, 115

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.