BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD.,
396 U.S. 114 (1969)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD., 396 U.S. 114 (1969)
396 U.S. 114 BALTHAZAR ET UX. v. MARI LTD. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS No. 593.
Decided December 8, 1969
301 F. Supp. 103, affirmed.
Marshall Patner for appellants.
Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
MATHIS v. NELSON, 396 U.S. 114 (1969)
396 U.S. 114 MATHIS v. NELSON, WARDEN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 620, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1969
70 Cal. 2d 467, 450 P.2d 290, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
