PURYEAR v. HOGAN, 396 U.S. 11 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

PURYEAR v. HOGAN, 396 U.S. 11 (1969)

396 U.S. 11

PURYEAR v. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NEW YORK COUNTY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 336, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1969

24 N.Y.2d 207, 247 N.E.2d 260, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for Hogan, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 11, 12

 


U.S. Supreme Court

PURYEAR v. HOGAN, 396 U.S. 11 (1969)

396 U.S. 11

PURYEAR v. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NEW YORK COUNTY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 336, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1969

24 N.Y.2d 207, 247 N.E.2d 260, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for Hogan, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 11, 12

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.