WHITLEY v. NEW YORK, 396 U.S. 10 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
WHITLEY v. NEW YORK, 396 U.S. 10 (1969)
396 U.S. 10 WHITLEY v. NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT No. 268, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1969
Appeal dismissed.
Henry B. Rothblatt and Emma A. Rothblatt for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
STOECKLE v. WISCONSIN, 396 U.S. 10 (1969)
396 U.S. 10 STOECKLE v. WISCONSIN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
No. 272, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1969
41 Wis. 2d 378, 164 N. W. 2d 303, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
WHITLEY v. NEW YORK, 396 U.S. 10 (1969)
396 U.S. 10 WHITLEY v. NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT No. 268, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1969
Appeal dismissed.
Henry B. Rothblatt and Emma A. Rothblatt for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
STOECKLE v. WISCONSIN, 396 U.S. 10 (1969)
396 U.S. 10 STOECKLE v. WISCONSIN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
No. 272, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1969
41 Wis. 2d 378, 164 N. W. 2d 303, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
