RISTUCCIA v. ADAMS, 396 U.S. 1 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

RISTUCCIA v. ADAMS, 396 U.S. 1 (1969)

396 U.S. 1

RISTUCCIA ET UX. v. ADAMS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 191.
Decided October 13, 1969

406 F.2d 1257, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

HAGAN v. REAGAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/1/case.html">396 U.S. 1</a> (1969) 396 U.S. 1 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HAGAN v. REAGAN, 396 U.S. 1 (1969)

396 U.S. 1

HAGAN ET AL. v. REAGAN, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA. No. 279.
Decided October 13, 1969

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. Williams v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 320.

Page 396 U.S. 1, 2




U.S. Supreme Court

RISTUCCIA v. ADAMS, 396 U.S. 1 (1969)

396 U.S. 1

RISTUCCIA ET UX. v. ADAMS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 191.
Decided October 13, 1969

406 F.2d 1257, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

HAGAN v. REAGAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/1/case.html">396 U.S. 1</a> (1969) 396 U.S. 1 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HAGAN v. REAGAN, 396 U.S. 1 (1969)

396 U.S. 1

HAGAN ET AL. v. REAGAN, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA. No. 279.
Decided October 13, 1969

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. Williams v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 320.

Page 396 U.S. 1, 2

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.