ATLAS ENGINE WORKS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD., 395 U.S. 828 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

ATLAS ENGINE WORKS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD., 395 U.S. 828 (1969)

395 U.S. 828

ATLAS ENGINE WORKS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 598.
Decided June 23, 1969.*

Certiorari granted; No. 598, 396 F.2d 775; No. 906, 404 F.2d 1097; No. 1213, 406 F.2d 17; No. 1273, 404 F.2d 105, vacated and remanded.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 906, Thrift Drug Co. of Pennsylvania v. National Labor Relations Board, and No. 1213, Lou De Young's Market Basket, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; and No. 1273, National Labor Relations Board v. Pembek Oil Corp., on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Robert B. Gosline for petitioner in No. 598. Robert Lewis for petitioner in No. 906. Laurent K. Varnum for petitioner in No. 1213. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for petitioner in No. 1273.

Solicitor General Griswold and Messrs. Ordman, Manoli, and Come for respondent in Nos. 598 and 906. Solicitor General Griswold and Mr. Ordman for respondent in No. 1213. William J. Larkin 2d for respondent in No. 1273.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the respective United States Courts of Appeals with instructions to remand the cases to the National Labor Relations Board for further consideration in light of NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., ante, p. 575.

Page 395 U.S. 828, 829




U.S. Supreme Court

ATLAS ENGINE WORKS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD., 395 U.S. 828 (1969)

395 U.S. 828

ATLAS ENGINE WORKS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 598.
Decided June 23, 1969.*

Certiorari granted; No. 598, 396 F.2d 775; No. 906, 404 F.2d 1097; No. 1213, 406 F.2d 17; No. 1273, 404 F.2d 105, vacated and remanded.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 906, Thrift Drug Co. of Pennsylvania v. National Labor Relations Board, and No. 1213, Lou De Young's Market Basket, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; and No. 1273, National Labor Relations Board v. Pembek Oil Corp., on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Robert B. Gosline for petitioner in No. 598. Robert Lewis for petitioner in No. 906. Laurent K. Varnum for petitioner in No. 1213. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for petitioner in No. 1273.

Solicitor General Griswold and Messrs. Ordman, Manoli, and Come for respondent in Nos. 598 and 906. Solicitor General Griswold and Mr. Ordman for respondent in No. 1213. William J. Larkin 2d for respondent in No. 1273.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the respective United States Courts of Appeals with instructions to remand the cases to the National Labor Relations Board for further consideration in light of NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., ante, p. 575.

Page 395 U.S. 828, 829

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.