MOYA v. DeBACA,
395 U.S. 825 (1969)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
MOYA v. DeBACA, 395 U.S. 825 (1969)
395 U.S. 825MOYA ET UX. v. DeBACA, DBA DeBACA & CO. CREDIT & COLLECTION AGENCY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 996, Misc.
Decided June 23, 1969.
286 F. Supp. 606, appeal dismissed.
William G. Fitzpatrick, Jr., for appellants.
Claud S. Mann for DeBaca et al., and Boston E. Witt, Attorney General, and James V. Noble, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Mexico, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would vacate the judgment and remand the case in light of Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, ante, p. 337.
U.S. Supreme Court
DILLARD v. FAMILY COURT, 395 U.S. 825 (1969)
395 U.S. 825 DILLARD v. FAMILY COURT, QUEENS COUNTY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1939, Misc.
Decided June 23, 1969.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
