BISENIUS v. KARNS, 395 U.S. 709 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
BISENIUS v. KARNS, 395 U.S. 709 (1969)
395 U.S. 709 BISENIUS v. KARNS, COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 1357.
Decided June 16, 1969.
42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 N. W. 2d 377, appeal dismissed.
S. A. Schapiro for appellant.
Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Albert Harriman and Robert D. Martinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK, 395 U.S. 709 (1969)
395 U.S. 709 STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 208, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1969.
Certiorari granted; 21 N. Y. 2d 706, 794; 234 N. E. 2d 698, 235 N. E. 2d 456, vacated and remanded.
William Cahn for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123.
U.S. Supreme Court
BISENIUS v. KARNS, 395 U.S. 709 (1969)
395 U.S. 709 BISENIUS v. KARNS, COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 1357.
Decided June 16, 1969.
42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 N. W. 2d 377, appeal dismissed.
S. A. Schapiro for appellant.
Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Albert Harriman and Robert D. Martinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK, 395 U.S. 709 (1969)
395 U.S. 709 STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 208, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1969.
Certiorari granted; 21 N. Y. 2d 706, 794; 234 N. E. 2d 698, 235 N. E. 2d 456, vacated and remanded.
William Cahn for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
