RAMM v. RAMM, 395 U.S. 462 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

RAMM v. RAMM, 395 U.S. 462 (1969)

395 U.S. 462

RAMM v. RAMM.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1294.
Decided June 9, 1969.

22 N. Y. 2d 926, 242 N. E. 2d 88, appeal dismissed.

Norman Ramm, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


JONES v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/395/462/case.html">395 U.S. 462</a> (1969) 395 U.S. 462 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JONES v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 462 (1969)

395 U.S. 462

JONES v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 966, Misc.
Decided June 9, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 400 F.2d 134, vacated and remanded.

Edward L. Cragen for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165.

Page 395 U.S. 462, 463




U.S. Supreme Court

RAMM v. RAMM, 395 U.S. 462 (1969)

395 U.S. 462

RAMM v. RAMM.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1294.
Decided June 9, 1969.

22 N. Y. 2d 926, 242 N. E. 2d 88, appeal dismissed.

Norman Ramm, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


JONES v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/395/462/case.html">395 U.S. 462</a> (1969) 395 U.S. 462 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JONES v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 462 (1969)

395 U.S. 462

JONES v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 966, Misc.
Decided June 9, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 400 F.2d 134, vacated and remanded.

Edward L. Cragen for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165.

Page 395 U.S. 462, 463

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.