SORANNO v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 461 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
SORANNO v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 461 (1969) 395 U.S. 461 SORANNO v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 838.
Decided June 9, 1969.
Certiorari granted; 401 F.2d 534, vacated and remanded.
J. B. Tietz for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Leonard H. Dickstein for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for further consideration in light of McKart v. United States, ante, p. 185.
U.S. Supreme Court
MEEKER v. WALKER, 395 U.S. 461 (1969) 395 U.S. 461 MEEKER v. WALKER ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 1293.
Decided June 9, 1969.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SORANNO v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 461 (1969) 395 U.S. 461 SORANNO v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 838.
Decided June 9, 1969.
Certiorari granted; 401 F.2d 534, vacated and remanded.
J. B. Tietz for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Leonard H. Dickstein for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for further consideration in light of McKart v. United States, ante, p. 185.
U.S. Supreme Court
MEEKER v. WALKER, 395 U.S. 461 (1969) 395 U.S. 461 MEEKER v. WALKER ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 1293.
Decided June 9, 1969.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The judgment is affirmed.
Page 395 U.S. 461, 462
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
