SHAW v. CALIFORNIA, 395 U.S. 211 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
SHAW v. CALIFORNIA, 395 U.S. 211 (1969)
395 U.S. 211 SHAW v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 1245.
Decided May 26, 1969.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Irving A. Kanarek for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
LOPO v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, 395 U.S. 211 (1969)
395 U.S. 211 LOPO v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 1257.
Decided May 26, 1969.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Robert E. Dunne for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
SHAW v. CALIFORNIA, 395 U.S. 211 (1969)
395 U.S. 211 SHAW v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 1245.
Decided May 26, 1969.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Irving A. Kanarek for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
LOPO v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, 395 U.S. 211 (1969)
395 U.S. 211 LOPO v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 1257.
Decided May 26, 1969.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Robert E. Dunne for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
