MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT, 395 U.S. 209 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT, 395 U.S. 209 (1969)
395 U.S. 209 MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 150.
Argued December 11, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.
4 Conn. Cir. 55, 225 A.2d 507, appeal dismissed.
Robert N. Grosby argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Joseph D. Harbaugh.
George F. Carroll, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT, 395 U.S. 209 (1969)
395 U.S. 209 MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 150.
Argued December 11, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.
4 Conn. Cir. 55, 225 A.2d 507, appeal dismissed.
Robert N. Grosby argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Joseph D. Harbaugh.
George F. Carroll, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
Page 395 U.S. 209, 210
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.