BUCKLEY v. OHIO, 395 U.S. 163 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
BUCKLEY v. OHIO, 395 U.S. 163 (1969)
395 U.S. 163 BUCKLEY ET AL., DBA BUCKLEY'S AUTO WRECKING v. OHIO BY BARBUTO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 1209.
Decided May 19, 1969.
16 Ohio St. 2d 128, 243 N.E.2d 66, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Edward D. Wyner for appellants.
Paul W. Brown, Attorney General of Ohio, pro se, and Robert D. Macklin, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of Ohio, and James V. Barbuto, pro se, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
BUCKLEY v. OHIO, 395 U.S. 163 (1969)
395 U.S. 163 BUCKLEY ET AL., DBA BUCKLEY'S AUTO WRECKING v. OHIO BY BARBUTO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 1209.
Decided May 19, 1969.
16 Ohio St. 2d 128, 243 N.E.2d 66, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Edward D. Wyner for appellants.
Paul W. Brown, Attorney General of Ohio, pro se, and Robert D. Macklin, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of Ohio, and James V. Barbuto, pro se, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 395 U.S. 163, 164
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
