JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL BOARD, 395 U.S. 162 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL BOARD, 395 U.S. 162 (1969)

395 U.S. 162

JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL BOARD.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1173.
Decided May 19, 1969.

Vacated and remanded.

William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Illinois Supreme Court having been rendered prior to our decision in Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814, which overruled MacDougall v. Green, 335 U.S. 281, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded so that it can be reconsidered in light of the changed circumstances.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment.

Page 395 U.S. 162, 163




U.S. Supreme Court

JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL BOARD, 395 U.S. 162 (1969)

395 U.S. 162

JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL BOARD.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1173.
Decided May 19, 1969.

Vacated and remanded.

William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Illinois Supreme Court having been rendered prior to our decision in Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814, which overruled MacDougall v. Green, 335 U.S. 281, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded so that it can be reconsidered in light of the changed circumstances.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment.

Page 395 U.S. 162, 163

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.