WAGGONER v. ROSENN
394 U.S. 846 (1969)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
WAGGONER v. ROSENN, 394 U.S. 846 (1969)
394 U.S. 846 WAGGONER ET AL. v. ROSENN, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 144, Misc.
Decided May 5, 1969.
286 F. Supp. 275, vacated and remanded.
William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Edgar R. Casper, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of appellants for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania for further consideration in light of Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 618.
U.S. Supreme Court
RHODES v. KANSAS, 394 U.S. 846 (1969)
394 U.S. 846 RHODES v. KANSAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT
COURT OF SEDGWICK COUNTY, KANSAS. No. 877, Misc.
Decided May 5, 1969.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Kent Frizzell, Attorney General of Kansas, and E. G. Collister, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court of Sedgwick County, Kansas, for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374.
